{"id":348,"date":"2009-10-29T18:58:28","date_gmt":"2009-10-29T18:58:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/?p=348"},"modified":"2009-10-29T18:58:28","modified_gmt":"2009-10-29T18:58:28","slug":"congratulations-to-dr-bex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/congratulations-to-dr-bex\/","title":{"rendered":"Congratulations to Dr. Bex"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Floris today successfully defended his PhD thesis entitled Evidence for a Good Story: A Hybrid Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence in Groningen, the Netherlands. His thesis work was supervised by <a href=\"http:\/\/people.cs.uu.nl\/henry\/\">Henry Prakken<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ai.rug.nl\/%7Everheij\/\">Bart Verheij<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.maastrichtuniversity.nl\/web\/Faculteiten\/FdR\/Thema\/Medewerkers\/MedewerkersAbc\/KoppenVanP.J..htm\">Peter van Koppen<\/a>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Abstract: The thesis develops a theory of reasoning with the evidence and facts in the context of criminal cases. In the literature two approaches to such reasoning have been proposed: argumentation and storytelling. It is discussed how stories and arguments can be combined in one hybrid theory, which is presented both in a formal logic as well as informally. Furthermore, criteria that a good story or argument should meet are given and a formal-logical dialogue game, which aims to concretise these criteria, is presented.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.computing.dundee.ac.uk\/staff\/florisbex\/Papers\/Summary%20Bex.pdf\">Summary<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Citation: F.J. Bex, Evidence for a Good Story: A Hybrid Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence. (2009) Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Floris today successfully defended his PhD thesis entitled Evidence for a Good Story: A Hybrid Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence in Groningen, the Netherlands. His thesis work was supervised by Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij and Peter van Koppen. Abstract: The thesis develops a theory of reasoning with the evidence and facts in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-events","category-news","category-staff"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=348"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":363,"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348\/revisions\/363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arg.tech\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}